https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

truthseekerblogger:

jerseydeanne:

World Trade Center Bldg 7 watch the controlled explosions 

I love to watch how they bring a building down and it takes months of planning and strategic placement of explosives.  I never believed in this conspiracy theory until I saw this video today. 

https://twitter.com/cnnbreyingnews/status/1172939630515302400?s=20

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theories

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tenants_in_7_World_Trade_Center

At the time, no steel frame high rise had ever before collapsed because of a fire, although there had been previous cases of collapses or partial collapses of smaller steel buildings due to fire.[74] However, the ability of such a building to be completely destroyed by fire would be demonstrated by the collapse of the Plasco Building in Tehran[75][76] in 2017 and the Wilton Paes de Almeida Building in São Paulo, Brazil, the following year.[77][78][79][80][81] In addition, 7 WTC also sustained significant structural damage during the collapse of 1 WTC from ejected debris.[82]

BBC News reported the collapse of 7 WTC twenty minutes before it actually fell.[83] The BBC has stated that many news sources were reporting the imminent collapse of 7 WTC on the day of the attacks.[84] Jane Standley, the reporter who announced the collapse prematurely, called it a “very small and very honest mistake” caused by her thinking on her feet after being confronted with a report she had no way of checking.[85]

In the PBS documentary America Rebuilds, which aired in September 2002, Larry Silverstein, the owner of 7 WTC and leaseholder and insurance policy holder for the remainder of the WTC complex, recalled a discussion with the fire department in which doubts about containing the fires were expressed. Silverstein recalled saying, “We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it”. “They made that decision to pull”, he recalled, “and we watched the building collapse.” Silverstein issued a statement that it was the firefighting team, not the building, that was to be pulled, contradicting theorists’ allegation that “pull” was used in a demolition-related sense.[73][86][87]

I learned this from DVDs being handed out in Daytona in 2003. They were having a rally or so “they” said..whoever they were that were handing out the DVDs…watching the DVD, specialist in their field of engineering were speaking of this being a controlled environment and that many heard banging in the walls for a week prior. Those who came forward lost their jobs for one reason another…if their claims were NOT true, why get rid of them..hmmm🤔

  1. actions

The worst possible thing to do is to implode more buildings. There is a reason why it takes months to do. All windows have to come out, any asbestos has to come out. It’s like breathing in shards of glass, being around erupting volcano.

The tenants that were in that building are important.

Insurance fraud because each building is insured separately, and terrorism riders are bought independently. Even though it sustained damage from flying debris didn’t make it unstable enough to come down. The insurance company has to make the determination to bring it down, they would access the situation with structural engineers.

You’re right why fire them. Joe M Qanon reblog this morning. 

(Source: https://t.co/)

Advertisements

About jerseydeanne

Retired to Florida. Opinionated, Empathic. Former Restaurant/Bar manager and Insurance agent. Learning Social Media for over 50 crowds. Everyone is welcome

View all posts by jerseydeanne

Join the conversation!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.