IN THE BEGINNING ? : 1969

There was a meeting of paediatricians and students which took place on the 20th March 1969 at the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society, which was located on Ridge Avenue in Pittsburgh.

One of the speakers was Dr Richard Day, an eminent professor and physician, and Medical Director of the organisation ‘Planned Parenthood’.

‘Planned Parenthood’ was established in 1921 (then under the name of the ‘American Birth Control League’) in the United States by Margaret Sanger, a proponent of birth control, and a member of the American Eugenics Society, which lobbied for women’s rights to have access to birth control methods and education. The organisation grew, and established clinics all over the USA (and has expanded into the world market), and is now the USA’s leading sexual and reproductive healthcare provider – and is the leading provider of abortion services. ‘Planned Parenthood’ has been the subject of intense criticism since its establishment, from anti-abortion organisations and campaigners, to those who have criticized that way the organisation is funded, both by the government, the Rockefeller Foundation (a family known to be part of the globalist elite, and has funded ‘Planned Parenthood’ since its inception in 1921), and private donors.

At the meeting on the 20th March 1969, Dr Day asked the attendees not to take notes or record what he was about to tell them. Something which Dr Dunegan said he found unusual for a professor to ask of his audience. The reason Dr Day implied was that there would be negative repercussions – possibly personal danger – against him if it became widely known that he had talked about the information he was about to relay to the group. Dr Day told the group that what he was about to say would make it easier for them to adapt if they knew what to expect beforehand, something of an ambiguous statement which became clearer as Dr Day spoke.

Dr Dunegan got the impression that Dr Day was talking as an ‘insider’, rather than as a person who was presenting a theory or speaking in terms of retrospect. Dr Day’s knowledge was concrete as he talked about the future and the strategies of people and organisations that had a defined plan for the world, and were in a position to make sure that plan was executed.

In introducing that there were those who had a plan for the world, Dr Day also informed his audience that there was a timescale, and that much of what they wanted would be achieved through plans that were already set in motion. Dr Dunegan recalls Dr Day saying “We plan to enter the twenty-first century with a running start. Everything is in place and nobody can stop us now…”, and that he felt relatively free to talk about this to those he considered friends. Dr Day referred to the plans of those in power as being ‘much bigger than communism’.

When talking about the people who had the power to devise and implement such plans, Dr Day stated that they were not primarily in public office, but were people of prominence who would be known to the public through their occupations or private positions. This ties-in with what we know about the globalist elite today, primarily consisting of families involved in operating large-scale financial institutions (the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and others), European royalty (Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Queen Elizabeth II, and others), and other extremely wealthy individuals that make up the 300 or so members.

Two other statements Dr Day made during his introduction were “People will have to get used to the idea of change, so used to change, that they’ll be expecting change. Nothing will be permanent,” and “People are too trusting. People don’t ask the right questions.”

If we look at how society has developed over the past forty years or so, attitudes have changed significantly, especially among the generations who were born from the 1970s onwards and have grown up in an atmosphere of change. The development of science and technology has happened at a faster rate than any other time in human history. People are able to travel to any part of the world, and many choose to spend time abroad, or work in different parts of their own country – something which to older generations would have seemed exotic or unattainable, preferring certain things to remain as they were as reference points in their lives and part of the solid foundation on which their society was maintained.

Our analysis is based on the taped interview with Dr Dunegan in 1988 when he recollected his memories of the meeting in 1969. In the analysis of events since the meeting in 1969, we have primarily used 1988 as a starting point because Dr Dunegan could not possibly have knowledge of future events, whereas there is a possibility that memories of the 1969 meeting may have become mixed with other perceptions between 1969 and 1988. Even so, any significant events which occurred between 1969 and 1988 are also included.
Extracted from : drricharday.wordpress.com

In Dr Days (taped ) speech he made a series of predictions which are coming true today .
“EVERYTHING IS IN PLACE AND NOTHING CAN STOP US NOW”

Tape 1 NEW ORDER OF BARBARIANS

Tape 2 NEW ORDER OF BARBARIANS

Tape 3 NEW ORDER OF BARBARIANS

Tape 4 NEW ORDER OF BARBARIANS

In this series of taped conversations or lectures, the future of the world is quite clearly laid out in graphic detail.
In this article are transcripts of tapes 1 to 3.

https://100777.com/nwo/barbarians

We are now in the throes of a worldwide Pandemic.
Our civil liberties have effectively been removed, often by stealth by our leaders. Our Health systems have been compromised, our ability to refuse the possibility of mandatory vaccines is being threatened for the common good. We are being forced to wear masks, our movements are being severely curtailed and we live in a state of permanent fear.

2020
ENTER KLAUS SCHWAB wab and the WEF GREAT RESET

Schwab set out this agenda back in 1971, in his book Moderne Unternehmensführung im Maschinenbau (Modern Enterprise Management in Mechanical Engineering), where his use of the term “stakeholders” (die Interessenten) effectively redefined human beings not as citizens, free individuals or members of communities, but as secondary participants in a massive commercial enterprise.

The aim of each and every person’s life was “to achieve long-term growth and prosperity” for this enterprise – in other words, to protect and increase the wealth of the capitalist elite.

This all became even clearer in 1987, when Schwab renamed his European Management Forum the World Economic Forum.

The WEF describes itself on its own website as “the global platform for public-private cooperation”, with admirers describing how it creates “partnerships between businessmen, politicians, intellectuals and other leaders of society to ‘define, discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda’.”

The “partnerships” which the WEF creates are aimed at replacing democracy with a global leadership of hand-picked and unelected individuals whose duty is not to serve the public, but to impose the rule of the 1% on that public with as little interference from the rest of us as possible.

In the books Schwab writes for public consumption, he expresses himself in the two-faced clichés of corporate spin and greenwashing.

The same empty terms are dished up time and time again. In Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Guide to Building a Better World Schwab talks of “the inclusion of stakeholders and the distribution of benefits” and of “sustainable and inclusive partnerships” which will lead us all to an “inclusive, sustainable and prosperous future”! (1)

Behind this bluster, the real motivation driving his “stakeholder capitalism”, which he was still relentlessly promoting at the WEF’s 2020 Davos conference, is profit and exploitation.

In this speech The Prince of Wales repeats the WEF GREAT RESET mantra that this pandemic is the opportunity to bring about great change

“We have a golden opportunity to seize something good from this crisis. Its unprecedented shockwaves may well make people more receptive to big visions of change,” he added.

This was also referred to obliquely in the tapes by Dr Richard Day.

THE NEXT PANDEMIC?

https://cyberpolygon.com/results-2020/

 

About Cyber Polygon
In 2020, Cyber Polygon became a unique event combining two tracks:

The world’s largest cybersecurity exercise for corporate technical teams
an online conference featuring senior officials from international organisations and leading corporations
The central theme of the event was a ’digital pandemic’: how to prevent a crisis and to reinforce cybersecurity on all levels. Hence, Cyber Polygon 2020 aimed to: develop the teams’ competencies in repelling cyberattacks
engage the management of global organisations and corporations in the cybersecurity dialogue
raise public awareness in cybersecurity

Structure
The event consisted of two parallel tracks.

Live Stream
The conference featured global leaders and experts, including Mikhail Mishustin, Prime Minister of the Russian Federation, and Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum as well as top officials from INTERPOL, ICANN, Visa, IBM, Sberbank, MTS, and other organisations.

The experts addressed the latest trends and technological threats, shared their experience in creating cybersecurity ecosystems, talked about the transforming threat landscape and discussed the problem of fake news and how to discern misinformation on the Web.

5 million people from 57 states
watched the live stream

Technical Training
The participants took the side of the Blue Team and worked on protecting their segments of the training infrastructure. The organisers from BI.ZONE represented the Red Team and simulated the attacks.

The exercise included two scenarios:

First, the participants practised containing a massive cyberattack in real time.
Then the teams had to investigate the identified incidents by applying traditional forensics as well as Threat Hunting.

120 teams from 29 countries
took part in the technical exercise

The event was joined by state and law enforcement agencies, financial, educational and healthcare institutions, organisations from the IT, telecom, energy, metal, chemical, aerospace engineering and other industries.

About Cyber Polygon
In 2020, Cyber Polygon became a unique event combining two tracks:

the world’s largest cybersecurity exercise for corporate technical teams
an online conference featuring senior officials from international organisations and leading corporations
The central theme of the event was a ’digital pandemic’: how to prevent a crisis and to reinforce cybersecurity on all levels. Hence, Cyber Polygon 2020 aimed to:

develop the teams’ competencies in repelling cyberattacks
engage the management of global organisations and corporations in the cybersecurity dialogue
raise public awareness in cyber security .

Cyber Polygon 2020

Cyber Polygon 2020
Conclusions
The following conclusions can be drawn based on the final results achieved by the participants.

Participants could assess their capabilities
It was not clear until the end of the exercise who would take the first place. Different teams were leading at different stages, which means that none of them could fully utilise the techniques at their disposal.

The exercise allowed the participants to identify their strengths and weaknesses. We hope that the received information will help them create plans for developing the necessary competencies and improve their results in the future.

Financial institutions and IT delivered the best results
Banks and companies from the IT industry demonstrated the highest resilience. Security assessment expertise in these sectors is quite well developed, with classic forensics and Threat Hunting widely applied.

Technical specialists are better prepared for investigation than for defence
27% of the teams had difficulties earning points in the first scenario, which allows us to conclude that some of the team members lacked or had insufficient expertise in security assessment and protection of web applications.

At the same time, all the participants were awarded points for the first round of the second scenario, which was indicative of each team having at least one expert competent in traditional forensics.

The Threat Hunting approach is uncharted for most organisations
21% of the teams could not earn a single point for the second round of the second scenario. We attribute this to Threat Hunting being a relatively novel approach and the majority of organisations lacking experience of applying its techniques. This creates the potential for developing teams and tools within the companies.

Threat Hunting is not an alternative to classic forensics, but we showed how this approach can supplement conventional methods.

More preparation — better result
The best results were predictably achieved by the teams who had asked many questions during the preparation and familiarised themselves with the new techniques and defences beforehand. We hope that our Cyber Polygon publications as well as other hosted events will increase future participants’ chances of succeeding and effectively countering cyberattacks.

Such events as Cyber Polygon already allow experts from participating organisations to increase their skills and draw the attention of a wider audience to the issues of cybersecurity.

We hope that the results and conclusions of this year’s training as well as the knowledge of invited experts will benefit the entire community and enable us to develop practical measures to improve global interaction in the fight against cybercrime.

A DARK WINTER ? A CYBER PANDEMIC ? BUILDING BACK BETTER

I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID. The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.”
— JEREMY JURGENS, WEF MANAGING DIRECTOR

“We all know, but still pay insufficient attention, to the frightening scenario of a comprehensive cyber attack could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole. The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack.

To use the COVID19 crisis as a timely opportunity to reflect on the lessons the cybersecurity community can draw and improve our unpreparedness for a potential cyber-pandemic.”
— KLAUS SCHWAB

https://archive.is/ZzALg

JOE BIDEN DARK WINTER . VIRAL OR CYBER PANDEMIC ?

Note our world leaders are all using the WEF mantra” BUILD BACK BETTER ”

After a cyber attack and a Great Reset we would be’ building back better’

KLAUS SCHWAB ON A CYBER ATTACK .

JEREMY JURGENS

PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING IN THE MEDIA .

These warnings have been in the media for some years . Now this is being found in the press and other media outlets more frequently.

WHAT DOES A DARK WINTER MEAN FOR THE GENERAL POPULATION?

MORE IN PART 2

First of 2 Deanne

Kitty ❤❤

 

Thank you kitty for another fantastic post to educate ourselves on what these crazy lunatics are up to. There is a lot more information out there and we will try to get those links to all.

 

My advice is to get ready for it! I bought a solar generator, I’m not losing my grocery again.  I started growing my own Romaine lettuce! I’ll be planting potatoes and herbs. Start collecting can goods, instant mashed and the lot.  I gave a list in another post.  if it doesn’t come I’m ready for hurricane season. Or I can donate to the food bank.

 

Love you, my friend 💕