Epstein ‘boasted he was selling Andrew’s ‘secrets’ to a Mossad spy

SPY CLAIMS Jeffrey Epstein ‘boasted he was selling Prince Andrew’s ‘secrets’ to a Mossad spy and called him his ‘Super Bowl trophy.’

OMG, It’s the gift that keeps on giving in this article! 

“Epstein was a bragger, a boaster,” Hoffenberg told The Sun.

 

“He always explained to me what he was up to. He acquired his first royal connection in the early nineties, he told me about it. He got it from [Ghislaine] Maxwell and used it substantially. That was the Super Bowl to him, it was the most important relationship to him.

 

”Epstein did meet Prince Andrew around 1991, this was said to me by Epstein. Epstein was very pleased with meeting the prince and it was in the UK.

 

“Epstein knew he could manipulate Andrew. That’s a solid fact. Epstein’s ability to manipulate was extraordinary. If he wanted to, he could have been the President of America.

 

“Andrew respected Epstein highly and was tremendously impressed, so that’s what made him vulnerable to Epstein.

“This was a trophy friendship, it was his strongest bond, even more than Clinton’s.”

 

Epstein was Narcisstic Psycopath without a moral compass; I’d put him in my serial killer/rapist category.  He is a confident hunter, and he knows how to manipulate his prey.  He should be considered at the top of the bunch with Son of Sam, Bundy, BTK.

Jeffrey was tops because of his total control. He was swimming with other Narcissistic people and made them live-out their fantasy at a huge price.  Some were powerful politicians, titans of business that dared to grab forbidden fruit.

Cameras were set up in all his houses, his private plane, nicknamed the Lolita Express, and Epstein threw parties for his high profile friends, providing a roster of younger, underage women, Hoffenberg said.

 

“He told me that Ghislaine Maxwell was going to be the breakthrough to bring him into that orbit – to be able to part of the agency in Israel – and that’s what did occur,” he said.

 

“They created the plan of installing the honeypot cameras and had taken over the house in Manhattan [given to him by his billionaire client Les Wexner] to blackmail the politicians.

 

“He then took over the house in Florida and put in cameras. The cameras were to record rapes, it wasn’t just about gathering intelligence, but compromising the politicians.

 

“When he befriended Andrew, he had a deal with the Israelis to gather the intelligence and information from people who Epstein took into his homes and his plane.

 

“I remember Andrew was at many of his events when he took over the house in Manhattan, that was in the early years.

 

“He got tremendous power and influence from Ghislaine, using that intelligence to socially climb, with Trump, Clinton and Andrew. Andrew didn’t understand he was being used, he’s a royal so doesn’t look at that.

 

“He would discuss tactics with me speaking of Andrew as a trophy, a tremendous friend and benefit in his social network, he’d brag about it. It was a big, big, big issue with him.

 

“This guy [Andrew] was seduced by Epstein, totally overwhelmed by him, so impressed with his authority and way of life, his fast lane. He is one in a kind of people. Clinton was brilliant with people, but Epstein was far above that level.

 

“Andrew had a weakness for the girls and fast life, Epstein provided that fantasy. Andrew would then give intelligence that Epstein would give to Israel. This was happening when I was working with Epstein.”

Advertisements

Princess Margaret’s lady-in-waiting about Harry and Meghan

‘Meghan Markle needed to learn to let Harry lead, like Kate does with William’, says Princess Margaret’s lady-in-waiting

 

Speaking seemingly before the Sussexes fully stepped back from royal duties, she said: “The Duchess of Cambridge has done a really good job.

“She hasn’t put herself forward, which is what happened with the Princess of Wales. She’s glorious looking, and sweet and perfect.

“But she lets Prince William take the lead, which is what the Duchess of Sussex may have to learn, that that’s what we want in the royal family.”

The Sun’s royal correspondent Emily Andrews added in the ITV show: “I think it helped that Catherine is a personality that is quite publicly closed, is quite careful, she never puts a nude court heel wrong does she.”

The Sussexes – Charles’ Duchy

Harry & Meghan’s ‘£2m pocket money’ is the tip of the iceberg – it’s time taxpayers looked into Charles’ Duchy

Harry will continue to receive £2million from his father, but although Charles has amassed a personal fortune of over £100million, the money might not be coming from that closely guarded pot.

The prince could instead be paying him through a outdated racket called the Duchy of Cornwall.

Charles could claim this as a business expense which means he can reduce the amount of tax he pays. The public would be paying for Harry by the back door.