The move is likely to open the attorney general to accusations that he is trying to deliver a political victory for President Trump.
Here it comes! Won’t the NY Times be surprised when it comes back on the Democrats or they going to deny the evidence?
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see Pelosi doesn’t want to hold a vote on the House floor. According to the Constitution, the House doesn’t have to vote to open the formal impeachment hearings. However, if the Dems want to show the public full transparency, they vote. Just like the House voted to impeach Clinton. They need to make all the witnesses available for the public to hear and judge for themselves. Can the House impeach Trump behind the close doors? Yes! (1)
(2) But it won’t go well for the Dems. The Senate will simply dismiss the “secret” impeachment. Yesterday Reps demanded to open up the door and allow a witness to testify in front of cameras. They were all rights to do so since no classified info was involved. Reps are pushing Pelosi to hold the vote. So far, she refuses to do it. Why? Because they have no strong case of impeachment.
That’s correct, but pretending to impeach is more damaging, and it’s getting coverage on CNN and MSNBC. It’s a disgusting PR ploy, a political conspiracy. There has to be a law somewhere to sue these bastards spewing lie after lie.
I believe when the Barr Durham report plus indictments come out, it will constitute a total breakdown for Zucker, Rachel Tinhat Maddow, and the like. Careers will be ruined, networks destroyed. They double down on the wrong tired insane horse.
Thank you anon, keep sending in the information, it’s vital! 🌸😎🥰
The prosecutor conducting the review, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, has expressed his intent to interview a number of current and former intelligence officials involved in examining Russia’s effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, including former CIA Director John Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper, Brennan told NBC News.
—— The liberal media cannot say “nothing to see there” anymore. John Durham would not question Brennan and Clapper just for fun.
This is great, I was shocked that they act like this is something new, but hey, we’ll take it!
The NYT is facing reality finally? Not only is John Durham questioning the FBI and CIA involvement in the Russian collusion hoax, but he is also investigating the Bidens business deals in Ukraine. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/10/06/us/politics/barr-and-a-top-prosecutor-cast-a-wide-net-in-reviewing-the-russia-inquiry.amp.html
Hey Anon! It appears they are pulling that way, but they aren’t there yet. MSM has to be thinking their viewership is down and is losing money. They are getting killed by Fox!
We must remember that all these are separate cases or torts. That means this could be different trails, and the Biden’s are going to have to pay millions to teams of lawyers.
I think Schiff is going to burn at stake for these leaks. Just saying
Gathering more receipts and look at what just happened there:
What are the police going to find? That they money launders for the mob and others.
God Bless Durham and Barr! God sped! We are counting on you!!
I don’t know if you post it or not, but it’s not even funny anymore.
Some still have a hard time to face the truth. The unverified Steele dossier was purchased by whom? By HRC. It turned out to be a piece of garbage.
They tried to do anything and everything possible to take down Trump. If they had any proof of DT “being a Russian spy,” they would have impeached him…