The Daily Mail ~ I forgive you~ Editorial

Many have been with me from the start as commenters on the Daily Mail to give opinions, and we loved the platform, How could I ever stay mad at them?  I’m not one to hold grudges forever, yeah sure, I could stay mad at Peter Sheridan and Charlotte Wace for Doxing me, what I was very hurt about, I gave information, and they chose to exclude it. 

What is happening now, the same information on this blog is now appearing all over the place. How about a little credit for running down leads, simple thank you would be good.

The British Royal Family belongs to ever one, occasionally there will be scrutiny through snark, sarcasm, and parody, that’s a fact, and they are aware of this.  Like any family, you may be upset with the things one of them do, doesn’t mean you fall out of like with them.


This recent rounds of ass kicking by the press is a wake-up call because the expenditures just came out.  The Press will do it every time one comes out, but Meghan is on the front because she doesn’t appreciate being a Royal and following the rules. Some may think Go Meghan! That’s certainly not how it works.

Embed from Getty Images

Royalty = Loyalty, and if you can’t do that, you’re toast! Avocados not included🥑

Thanks for reading, 🌸😎JD




The Sun ~ Dan Wooten~ Meghan Markle the Duchesss of Duress

She initially wanted a tiara that featured emeralds, according to royal sources. But the future Duke and Duchess of Sussex were unhappy when told her first choice was impossible, as no one knew exactly where it came from.

A new book by reporter Richard Jobson reveals Harry told staff before the wedding: “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets.”

Was she after Eugenie’s Tiara?

But Meghan, 37, eventually wore a diamond and platinum headpiece chosen by the Queen.

A well-placed royal insider said: “Meghan had her heart set on this tiara with emeralds and Prince Harry hit the roof when they were told it was impossible for her to wear it

What a bitch 

“The provenance of the tiara could not be established. There were concerns it could have come from Russia originally.

“There was a very heated exchange that prompted the Queen to speak to Harry. She said, ‘Meghan cannot have whatever she wants. She gets what tiara she’s given by me’.

“The Queen also questioned why Meghan needed a veil for the wedding, given it was to be her second marriage.

YAY! I knew it!  Back at your vicious clickbait! 

“The message from the Queen was very much Meghan needed to think about how she speaks to staff members and be careful to follow family protocols.”

confimation she treats staff like crap 💩

In an interview, Meghan said she chose the tiara she did wear after visiting Buckingham Palace with Harry, 34, to see the Queen and view the “options”.

Meg, liar, liar, pants on fire, you are full of yourself, you ungrateful huzzy

It has also emerged Meghan and Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge, 36, have clashed over the treatment of staff.

The royal insider added: “Meghan can be difficult.

MM diva attitude towards kind advisors, she deserves a swift kick in her rubber ass!

“She has very high standards and is used to working in a Hollywood environment.

Ha! Bloody Narc!

“However, there’s a different degree of respect in the royal household and Kate has always been very careful about how she has acted around staff.”

Kate is a decent person, MM is a vile ungrateful grifter

A spokesman for Meghan and Harry declined to comment.

Here it comes MM, tick tock #freeprinceharry

Meanwhile, Richard Jobson’s book, Charles at 70, said the Queen and Meg have bonded over a love of dogs.

Roseberrycupcakes submitted

As some of you may know, I refrained from being critical of the BRF for quite some time. I remained especially cautious of criticizing Harry, because I’ve been in his shoes and know how difficult it is to be in a relationship with a person everyone around you hates and/or to trick everyone around you to please them.

I’ve been keeping tabs on the blogs. Soho Anon and NSW offered new and interesting insights that seemed to tie pieces together. But if I had to choose ONE post that bothered me the most, it would be a GIF of Meghan lifting her eyebrows commenting that Harry’s “well-fed” during her cookbook outing.

When you’re in love, it shows. Or to be more precise, it shows when you’re NOT in love. Two people in love or at least in close proximity are always hypersensitive to each other’s actions and reactions. And even if THEY try to hide their true feelings in front of others, the mask tend to slip in most obvious way.

Allow me to give you an example: I had a platonic “fling” with a neurosurgery attending I used to work with. Without going into unnecessary detail, I’ll share a cute anecdote: I scrubbed in his open craniotomy one day, and when he was performing irrigation (washing the blood off) before closing, some blood splattered over me. I forgot to put on safety goggles (it was an emergency surgery, and we were in a rush), and I jumped slightly to avoid getting blood into my eyes. The next time he performed irrigation, he put his hand over the site to prevent blood from splattering. I cringed slightly when he did it, because surgeons, especially neurosurgeons, NEVER do something so considerate especially when they’re focused on closing someone else’s skull. He might as well have told all the scrub nurses that he was interested in me (rumors, of course, spread after this incident).

Smallest actions can reveal your true feelings when it comes to romance. That neurosurgery attending’s uncharacteristic show of manners was one; Meghan’s lifting of her eyebrows in annoyance/haughtiness was another. If someone were to tell ME to make sure that my boyfriend’s well-fed, I would NEVER lift my eyebrows like Meghan did. It’s not because I’m somehow “nicer” than Meghan; it’s because when you’re genuinely in love, you don’t perceive yourself as being superior to your lover. You want to make sure your partner’s well-fed even if they’re overweight. And your response to others’ comments about your lover is a display of your true feelings toward him.

We all knew Meghan was never really in love with Harry. Looking at Meghan’s family and their antics, we knew Harry married Meghan (if not by coercion) for “love.” The problem is, a romantic who’s willing to make such stance will always be hypersensitive to his lover’s actions. So if WE outsiders noticed Meghan’s true feelings toward Harry, Harry must already know that he has everything to lose and nothing to gain.

When you’re in love or have fallen out of love, others around you will be first to notice. So Meghan can continue to “correct” her mistakes on following engagements with Harry. She can give him “loved-up” looks for the cameras, and they can hold hands and blow each other kisses. Whatever. The debate on whether Harry’s with Meghan willingly and for what reason are different issues; but the FACT is, Harry and Meghan are NOT in love with each other. Now that I’ve been in love and I’m in love, I can be sure of that. -Roseberrycupcakes

//*Tip for Harry and hopeless romantics like him*

When someone loves you, it shows. You KNOW they love you. If you have to convince yourself that they love you, then they don’t. It’s as simple as that. I never once doubted that my neuro attending liked me; but I’ve been in relationships where I had to convince myself that my boyfriend (ex-boyfriend) “really truly” loved me.

Likewise, if you have to come up with a list of good qualities about your lover for you to remind yourself that you *are* in love with them, you’re not really in love with them. Love is not about being attracted to someone “because” they’re something or the other; it’s about being attracted “despite” their flaws. Love makes you do things you wound’t normally do; love is the urge to be someone better than you used to be, the need to do something you don’t normally do just to impress someone who you KNOW is flawed. So while your love may be unconditional, they’re never blind.//


JD’s friend ~ Roseberry Cupcakes with editorial

Just “be yourself”?

If they don’t want to be liked “just because they’re royals,” they shouldn’t EXPECT to be protected “just because they’re royals.”

If they want to be liked for “who they are,” they SHOULD expect to be criticized for WHO they are, WHAT they do, and HOW they do it.

No one likes grifters who want to be praised while having others do their dirty work for them. If they want to say one thing, while doing something else, there’s a name for them: HYPOCRITES. -Roseberrycupcakes

//It’s been a while, friends. I read the blogs regularly. But I refrained from sending in submissions, because I simply couldn’t think of anything to write. I wanted to give the BRF the benefit of the doubt, but it seems like they’re already running out of public sympathy. I’ve been saying this for a while now: the time is running out for them. For the royalists who claim that the BRF “will win” based on the fact that “they’ve lasted for centuries”: greater empires and better kingdoms have fallen. If the BRF refuses to change ways, they won’t be an exception. Don’t be fooled by the grandeur of their past. It will be you who will be left brokenhearted.//

Roseberrycupcake Bites

When Kim Kardashian rose to fame, many people raised their eyebrows. The idea of a “Z-lister with a sextape” being famous “for being famous” was quite unthinkable. In fact, I remember how President Obama just MENTIONING the fact that he and his wife don’t allow their daughters to watch Keeping up with the Kardashians made the headlines just several years ago. Back then, the idea of a president even being AWARE of someone like Kim seemed beneath the office of presidency. Back then, people disliked the Kardashians with passion. Even people who disliked Kim knew that she was criticized for anything and everything she did. 


Because she represented the very antithesis of the paradigm we grew up with: work hard, be honest, and you will succeed. 

But now, we see that the hatred towards Kim has more or less diminished over the years. This is not a sign that people have changed their minds about Kim; it’s reflective of the growing apathy towards her. They know she’s going to always be in the news regardless of what they say, so they don’t really care. Kim’s “momager” Kris Kardashian knows this, which is why her younger daughters, Kylie and Kendall, dominate the headlines now. The Kardashians come up with more and more ridiculous storylines to keep the media’s spotlight on them.

I’ve seen many comparisons between Meghan and Kim on here and other forums, and I will say this: Kim was someone who everyone had to agree WAS pretty (regardless of the nose job and other numerous plastic surgery), especially during her earlier years. She was pretty enough for women to be jealous of, yet with a past that could be gossiped about. She had an attitude but a likable one. In other words, Kim has/had an “it” factor. 

Problem with Meghan is that she thinks people dislike her like they disliked Kim. Reality check: Meghan was never as pretty or attractive as Kim. I’m not trying to be mean; there’s nothing wrong with being plain, but when a Plain Jane tries to act like Jane Fonda, you will get on people’s nerves. So people are not “jealous” of Meghan; she never had that sparkle that A-listers and politicians have, which is why she never made it in Hollywood in the first place.

Dislike towards Meghan is rooted in confusion: people don’t understand how someone who’s not that pretty, not well-educated, and not well-mannered, who’s a born-and-bred hypocrite could enter into a centuries-old establishment that is supposed to be revered. The kindest explanation people can come up with is, “She must have something special only Harry must recognize,” which of course throws Harry under the bus.

On these blogs, it’s been clear that the BRF wants minimal exposure of their faults while they wait for “the storm to pass.” They’re so utterly foolish that they’re practically hopeless. The BRF are still failing to recognize that this is a different time; there’s no such thing as a second chance in the era of social media when people will jump on to the next bandwagon without looking back. An institution like theirs is built on smokes and mirrors, and it’s THEIR responsibility to maintain that facade, no matter how detached from reality it may be.

By the time criticisms toward Meghan subside, neither her or the BRF will be smiling, because that’s when they will receive their punishment. They’ve already made mistakes that cannot be forgiven. Let’s just hope they will stop before it truly is too late.


I love your editorials!  I hope you come onto word press and drop a few off.

😍🌺🌺 😎

Meghan Markle’s Dad Seeks to Shame Her

Meghan Markle’s Dad Seeks to Shame Her