The Hill – Obama goes after Bernie


Video of Michelle and Barack Obama’s disdain for the American Flag


He who controls the Rare Earth Elements controls the world

He who controls the Rare Earth Elements controls the world

by jerseydeanne

Let me give some background, I’m an amateur rock hound, and I love semi-precious gemstones to collect and display. Being that I’m a little nerdy, I wanted to know where they come from and the properties these lovely things are made of.  Afghanistan has semi-precious stones which we’ve all known they’ve been sitting on since the dawn of time, Kunzite, Amber, Lapis, gold, and copper. How do they mine anything with the country in turmoil?

Afghanistan biggest export seemed to be opium creating drug addicts all over the world, but it appears the Chinese have stepped it up a notch by stepping on the Heroin by adding deadly fentanyl to the mix. They are killing tens of thousands of people.  Heroin is getting replaced by fentanyl. Farmers of poppies tar are not making money, some are encouraged to grow fruit crops in Mexico, but the more significant money makers are cannabis that grows like a weed.

In 2009, in one of his first major war policy decisions since becoming president, Barack Obama oversaw an end to U.S. poppy eradication. The substitute seed program continued, and even accelerated. The monitoring of drug networks was stepped up – but largely to find their connections to militant cells. Kingpins were still busted. But torching fields was over. Without American support, Afghan government counternarcotic operations withered to a merely symbolic scale. Kabul’s agents would raze one acre of a 10-acre plot and call it “eradicated.” The agents got paid, the government could tell Russia and the U.N. that it was cracking down on drugs and the farmers still had viable fields. While the fighting in Afghanistan continued to escalate after 2009, the poppy farms were no longer the major source of instability.

This intelligence-gathering mission seems to be going nowhere. But after half an hour or so Mohammad grows more comfortable and expansive. He explains that today’s poppy prices are down compared to the golden years of the late 1990s, when the Taliban was in charge, there was no eradication – token or otherwise – and U.S. troops weren’t hanging around trying to figure out how they felt about the crop. “People are still dreaming of the boom years,” he says.

This is a working theory folks, I want to make awareness of the Fentanyl epidemic brought on by Chinese gangs and REM.  If these people are struggling to make a living growing poppy, how fast will they jump on the mining of REM?  It’s psyops, don’t push eradication but instead gentle tell them about REM making millionaires overnight, how glorious does that sound?  Read the entire Wired Article written by David Axe its good.



What  Afghanistan has is a wealth of rare earth minerals.  What are rare earth minerals you ask?

rare-earth element (REE) or rare-earth metal (REM), as defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, is one of a set of seventeen chemical elements in the periodic table, specifically the fifteen lanthanides, as well as scandium and yttrium.[2] Scandium and yttrium are considered rare-earth elements because they tend to occur in the same ore deposits as the lanthanides and exhibit similar chemical properties, but have different electronic and magnetic properties.[3] Rarely, a broader definition that includes actinides may be used, since the actinides share some mineralogical, chemical, and physical (especially electron shell configuration) characteristics.[4]

The 17 rare-earth elements are cerium (Ce), dysprosium (Dy), erbium (Er), europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), holmium (Ho), lanthanum (La), lutetium (Lu), neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr), promethium (Pm), samarium (Sm), scandium (Sc), terbium (Tb), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb), and yttrium (Y). They are often found in minerals with thorium (Th), and less commonly uranium (U).

Despite their name, rare-earth elements are – with the exception of the radioactive promethium – relatively plentiful in Earth’s crust, with cerium being the 25th most abundant element at 68 parts per million, more abundant than copper. However, because of their geochemical properties, rare-earth elements are typically dispersed and not often found concentrated in rare-earth minerals; as a result economically exploitable ore deposits are less common.[5] The first rare-earth mineral discovered (1787) was gadolinite, a mineral composed of cerium, yttrium, iron, silicon, and other elements. This mineral was extracted from a mine in the village of Ytterby in Sweden; four of the rare-earth elements bear names derived from this single location.

Take a look at the link and see the elements and what they are used for, big tech comes to mind.

Until 1948, most of the world’s rare earths were sourced from placer sand deposits in India and Brazil. Through the 1950s, South Africa was the world’s rare-earth source, from a monazite-rich reef at the Steenkampskraal mine in Western Cape province.[27] Through the 1960s until the 1980s, the Mountain Pass rare earth mine in California made the United States the leading producer. Today, the Indian and South African deposits still produce some rare-earth concentrates, but they are dwarfed by the scale of Chinese production. In 2017, China produced 81% of the world’s rare-earth supply, mostly in Inner Mongolia,[5][28] although it had only 36.7% of reserves. Australia was the second and only other major producer with 15% of world production.[29] All of the world’s heavy rare earths (such as dysprosium) come from Chinese rare-earth sources such as the polymetallic Bayan Obo deposit.[28][30] The Browns Range mine, located 160 km south east of Halls Creek in northern Western Australia, is currently under development and is positioned to become the first significant dysprosium producer outside of China.[31]


A table listing the 17 rare-earth elements, their atomic number and symbol, the etymology of their names, and their main usages (see also Applications of lanthanides) is provided here. Some of the rare-earth elements are named after the scientists who discovered or elucidated their elemental properties, and some after their geographical discovery.

Z Symbol Name Etymology Selected applications Abundance[6] (ppm[a])
21 Sc Scandium from Latin Scandia (Scandinavia). Light aluminium-scandium alloys for aerospace components, additive in metal-halide lamps and mercury-vapor lamps,[7] radioactive tracing agent in oil refineries 22[8]
39 Y Yttrium after the village of Ytterby, Sweden, where the first rare earth ore was discovered. Yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) laser, yttrium vanadate (YVO4) as host for europium in television red phosphor, YBCO high-temperature superconductorsyttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), yttrium iron garnet (YIG) microwave filters,[7] energy-efficient light bulbs (part of triphosphor white phosphor coating in fluorescent tubes, CFLs and CCFLs, and yellow phosphor coating in white LEDs),[9] spark plugs, gas mantles, additive to steel, cancer treatments 33[8]
57 La Lanthanum from the Greek “lanthanein”, meaning to be hidden. High refractive index and alkali-resistant glass, flint, hydrogen storage, battery-electrodes, camera lenses, fluid catalytic cracking catalyst for oil refineries 39[8]
58 Ce Cerium after the dwarf planet Ceres, named after the Roman goddess of agriculture. Chemical oxidizing agent, polishing powder, yellow colors in glass and ceramics, catalyst for self-cleaning ovensfluid catalytic cracking catalyst for oil refineries, ferrocerium flints for lighters, robust intrinsically hydrophobic coatings for turbine blades. 66.5[8]
59 Pr Praseodymium from the Greek “prasios”, meaning leek-green, and “didymos”, meaning twin. Rare-earth magnetslasers, core material for carbon arc lighting, colorant in glasses and enamels, additive in didymium glass used in welding goggles,[7] ferrocerium firesteel (flint) products. 9.2[8]
60 Nd Neodymium from the Greek “neos”, meaning new, and “didymos”, meaning twin. Rare-earth magnetslasers, violet colors in glass and ceramics, didymium glass, ceramic capacitors, electric motors of electric automobiles 41.5[8]
61 Pm Promethium after the Titan Prometheus, who brought fire to mortals. Nuclear batteriesluminous paint 1×10−15[10][b]
62 Sm Samarium after mine official, Vasili Samarsky-Bykhovets. Rare-earth magnetslasersneutron capturemaserscontrol rods of nuclear reactors 7.05[8]
63 Eu Europium after the continent of Europe. Red and blue phosphorslasersmercury-vapor lampsfluorescent lampsNMR relaxation agent 2[8]
64 Gd Gadolinium after Johan Gadolin (1760–1852), to honor his investigation of rare earths. High refractive index glass or garnetslasersX-ray tubescomputer memoriesneutron captureMRI contrast agentNMR relaxation agent, magnetostrictive alloys such as Galfenol, steel additive 6.2[8]
65 Tb Terbium after the village of Ytterby, Sweden. Additive in Neodymium based magnets, green phosphorslasersfluorescent lamps (as part of the white triband phosphor coating), magnetostrictive alloys such as terfenol-D, naval sonar systems, stabilizer of fuel cells 1.2[8]
66 Dy Dysprosium from the Greek “dysprositos”, meaning hard to get. Additive in Neodymium based magnetslasersmagnetostrictive alloys such as terfenol-Dhard disk drives 5.2[8]
67 Ho Holmium after Stockholm (in Latin, “Holmia”), native city of one of its discoverers. Lasers, wavelength calibration standards for optical spectrophotometersmagnets 1.3[8]
68 Er Erbium after the village of Ytterby, Sweden. Infrared lasersvanadium steelfiber-optic technology 3.5[8]
69 Tm Thulium after the mythological northern land of Thule. Portable X-ray machinesmetal-halide lampslasers 0.52[8]
70 Yb Ytterbium after the village of Ytterby, Sweden. Infrared lasers, chemical reducing agentdecoy flaresstainless steelstress gaugesnuclear medicine, monitoring earthquakes 3.2[8]
71 Lu Lutetium after Lutetia, the city that later became Paris. Positron emission tomography – PET scan detectors, high-refractive-index glass, lutetium tantalate hosts for phosphors, catalyst used in refineriesLED light bulb 0.8[8]
  1. ^ Parts per million in earth’s crust, e.g. Pb=13 ppm
  2. ^ No stable isotopes occurring in nature.


The following abbreviations are often used:

  • RE = rare earth
  • REM = rare-earth metals
  • REE = rare-earth elements
  • REO = rare-earth oxides
  • REY = rare-earth elements and yttrium
  • LREE = light rare-earth elements
  • HREE = heavy rare-earth elements

Read this full article! written by By   Planet Earth 

This is some excerpt


Despite being one of the poorest nations in the world, Afghanistan may be sitting on one of the richest troves of minerals in the world, valued at nearly $1 trillion, according to U.S. scientists.

Afghanistan, a country nearly the size of Texas, is loaded with minerals deposited by the violent collision of the Indian subcontinent with Asia. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) began inspecting what mineral resources Afghanistan had after U.S.-led forces drove the Taliban from power in the country in 2004. As it turns out, the Afghanistan Geological Survey staff had kept Soviet geological maps and reports up to 50 years old or more that hinted at a geological gold mine.

In 2006, U.S. researchers flew airborne missions to conduct magnetic, gravity and hyperspectral surveys over Afghanistan. The magnetic surveys probed for iron-bearing minerals up to 6 miles (10 kilometers) below the surface, while the gravity surveys tried to identify sediment-filled basins potentially rich in oil and gas. The hyperspectral survey looked at the spectrum of light reflected off rocks to identify the light signatures unique to each mineral. More than 70 percent of the country was mapped in just two months. [Facts About Rare Earth Minerals (Infographic)]

The surveys verified all the major Soviet finds. Afghanistan may hold 60 million tons of copper, 2.2 billion tons of iron ore, 1.4 million tons of rare earth elements such as lanthanum, cerium and neodymium, and lodes of aluminumgold, silver, zinc, mercury and lithium. For instance, the Khanneshin carbonatite deposit in Afghanistan’s Helmand province is valued at $89 billion, full as it is with rare earth elements.

The researchers’ work has helped develop what are essentially treasure maps that let mining companies know what minerals are there, how much is there, and where they are, all to attract bids on the rights to the deposits. The Afghan government has already signed a 30-year, $3 billion contract with the China Metallurgical Group, a state-owned mining enterprise based in Beijing, to exploit the Mes Aynak copper deposit, and awarded mining rights for the country’s biggest iron deposit to a group of Indian state-run and private companies. [Is China Mining a Rare Earth Monopoly? Op-Ed]

WAKE UP! If you vote, the Dems in those skies are falling narratives will come true, and you won’t be driving a fossil fuel car but the electric one. Since we know they did quid pro quo with Ukraine, they no doubt will do the same in Afghanistan.  China has already got their hands in the pot of gold. These deals happened under the Obama administration and, most likely, Hillary Clinton.

I never thought this dive was so deep!


Kitty our amazing researcher went and found us some more links and we like to thank the Global Research site 💋 that posted this

We do have the capabilities to track resources from space, that’s not a lie.  I love when people come to Oak Island and show them new gadgets to find treasure.  Seal Team the TV show that I was binge-watching the other night did an episode on finding REM, I had to find out if it was true and here it is.  We don’t go to war for anything, but I do think that we got had on this one or maybe Team Obama had to have known all about it.


Now Burns is not sure if the House even impeaches Trump

On Fox Nation’s “Deep Dive” Wednesday, Burns said that the “elephant in the room” is that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., opted not to ask the full House of Representatives to vote on the question of opening a formal impeachment inquiry into President Trump. Instead, Pelosi announced that an impeachment inquiry had begun, breaking precedent regarding these proceedings.

“You don’t have to be a rocket scientist or an MIT professor to know that they didn’t do a vote because they didn’t want to have [Democratic House members] stand up in districts that were against it and have to vote for it,” said Burns, adding that some moderate Democrats are hesitant to declare their support for impeachment.

He predicted that Democrats will eventually abandon their impeachment push.

“I think they’re going to come out and [say]… ‘We do not want to put the American public through this type of debacle. However, of course, it’s fully warranted,’” Burns
From my understanding, he is saying if the full House doesn’t vote on the formal impeachment hearings, it will go nowhere. Does the House have a convincing case of impeachment? It doesn’t look like this. Otherwise, the House would have voted and impeachment hearings would have made public.


You are correct, it’s political suicide to try to do this when they damn well know Barr and Durham are about to turn everything upside down and throw it on the Obama administration that includes Biden, Pelosi, Killary, Schiff under the bus. 

See Hillary really thought she was going to win and those rat bastards would continue to pilfer Ukraine and anyone else they wanted Quid Pro Quo from.

Continue the endless wars while lining their pockets with millions for weapons deals. 

Career Democrats still have to be elected in 2020. They have to think, I’m going to lose my cushy power.  

I don’t care what party affiliation you are, this is wrong, and these clowns need to brought to justice. 

Thank you anon, let’s get the word out! 🌸😎🥰

Huge news in Italy

HUGE NEWS in ITALY today John Durham expended his investigation based on a new piece of evidence uncovered in Rome.

Today the President of the Conte Council will be heard by Copasir (Parliamentary Committee for the Security of the Republic) on the meetings of August 15 and September 27 between the heads of the Italian secret services and the men of Trump, the Attorney General Barr and the prosecutor Durham , who are investigating the origins of Russiagate / Spygate and the alleged involvement of some allied countries, including ours.

The question, to which we will try to give an answer tomorrow, is whether the Copasir will show the will to turn the spotlight on the events that took place in Rome starting from March 2016 not only at Link Campus University , on the figure of Professor Joseph Mifsud – that he remained hidden, perhaps still in Rome, while the special prosecutor Mueller’s investigation was underway – and in the Occhionero case, or if he will simply contest his conduct in authorizing the “unusual” meetings of our services to Prime Minister Conte with the Americans.

In recent days we have read in the Italian press many reconstructions aimed at minimizing the role of Mifsud and in any case to distance his figure from Western academic, political and intelligence circles, particularly Italians. It goes from the founder of Link , the former interior minister Vincenzo Scotti, who interviewed by La Stampa suggests “asking the English” of Mifsud, to la Repubblica , which dedicated two pages to the Maltese professor to say, in essence, that this is a braggart, or rather a “cazzaro” , passing through Il Foglio, which after having reported the statements of the lawyer Roh on the alleged role of our services in losing track since November 2017, today claims that “the Mifsud link is with Russia” .

All this while from overseas, on the contrary, confirmations arrive that the investigations of the prosecutor Durham are concentrating on this very track, which leads to Italy, the United Kingdom and Australia. In particular on the basis of “new evidence gathered during his recent visit to Rome together with the Barr Barr”, sources at Fox News report , his investigation has been expanded. The prosecutor would have found “something significant” and would be ready to question former CIA directors Brennan and the National Intelligence Clapper. But in particular, the fact that he got two BlackBerry phones (with English Sim card) “data in use at Mifsud”, of which now the lawyer of former general Flynn, Sidney Powell, asks for the data, it means that Durham is trying to establish the real role of the mysterious Maltese professor.

Those who have followed our Special from the beginning know that our hypothesis is that Mifsud was not actually an agent or asset of the Russians, but that he lent himself to an operation aimed at fabricating an element of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, or at least to tempt the latter. A hypothesis that is based not only on the links, working relationships and acquaintances of Mifsud – although in reality much more extensive and in-depth those with Western environments – but on the questions left unanswered, even after the investigation and the report by the special prosecutor Mueller , and on the contradictions emerged in the behavior of the FBI and the DOJ towards him.

Interlocution between Mifsud and George Papadopoulos, the former Trump Campaign advisor to whom he reported the “dirt” materialon Hillary Clinton (thousands of her emails) owned by the Russians, she is considered so serious and worrying by the FBI to induce her, on 31 July 2016, to open the counterintelligence investigation into the alleged Trump-Russia collusion. Not only that: in the following months, the “news” that Mifsud had reported to Papadopoulos of Clinton’s emails to the Russians is considered by the FBI to be so credible 1) to base the request for a FISA mandate to intercept a Trump Campaign collaborator, Carter Page, and subsequent surveillance extensions; 2) send an undercover agent to London, together with Professor Halper, to check what Papadopoulos knew and what he intended to do with that information; 3) torment the same Papadopoulos incriminating him for lying about his encounters with Mifsud and thus hampering the FBI’s investigation. All this, we ask ourselves, in at least six months of investigations, while the FBI would have been able to ascertain just a few days, as it did.the Republic , which Mifsud is a well-known boaster, a “cazzaro” ?

Considered so worrying and credible as to contribute to the unheard-of decision to “spy on” a presidential candidate’s campaign, the Mifsud-Papadopoulos case cannot be dismissed as special prosecutor Mueller did in his report and in his Congressional hearing, without answering to the fundamental question: who is Mifsud and on behalf of those who acted when he came into contact in a way that was anything but casual with Papadopoulos, who had just joined the Trump Campaign?

And here the contradictions open up. His investigation continued for over two years, Mueller indicted many people, including Papadopoulos himself, even for just lying to the FBI. Yet, despite Mifsud’s lying to the agency, the prosecutor never charged him. Why? One question, as we have already reported , mail directly to Mueller during his hearing in Congress by Republican Jim Jordan: “Why did not you charge for Joseph Mifsud lying to the FBI?” “I can not get into it” , I can’t answer that, it was the prosecutor’s reply. “I’m struggling to understand why you didn’t indicate Joseph Mifsud”, urged another Republican deputy, Devin Nunes, obtaining this reply from Mueller: “You cannot get classified or law enforcement information without a rationale for doing it and I have said to you”. Mr Mifsud ” .

In his report, Mueller does not explicitly state that “the professor” was a Russian agent, as claimed by former FBI director James Comey at the Washington Post, but alludes to it, writing that Papadopoulos was right to believe it and reporting his contacts with figures close to the Kremlin and Russian espionage, though without specifying its nature and movements. In the months when he met and talked with Papadopoulos, the professor managed to put him in touch only with the director of a think tank linked to the Russian Foreign Ministry, Ivan Timofeev, and with a woman whom Papadopoulos claims he was introduced to him as his nephew Putin but maybe he wasn’t even Russian. However, Mueller does not cite Mifsud’s much closer and more intense relations with Western academic, diplomatic, political and intelligence circles.

We are talking about NATO military personnel, former American and British intelligence officials, diplomats, ministers and Western politicians, the former vice president of the European Parliament, Pittella, who called him a “dear friend”. As director of the London Academy of Diplomacy , Mifsud worked with the British Foreign Office. He was among the executives of the London Center for International Law Practice (LCILP), where Papadopoulos worked for a short time before joining the Trump Campaign. “It would not have taken long for Peter Strzok (the FBI agent who opened the investigation, ed) to draw a profile on LCILP and its directors,” explained British analyst Chris Blackburn to the Washington Times. “He was focused on counterterrorism. His directors have previously worked closely with the FBI and claim on their site to have a US State Department contract to teach intelligence to law enforcement officials and Libyan intelligence ”.

As is known, Mifsud also played an important role at Link Campus University , where, also here, intelligence courses and conferences on security are held with CIA, FBI, MI6 officials and Italian services. A photograph of October 2012 shows him with officers of the Italian army on the occasion of a training program on the international security for armed forces and law enforcement of our country, organized by Link Campus and London Academy of Diplomacy . Together with him, Claire Smith, a long-time diplomat, then a member of the Joint Intelligence Committee of the United Kingdom, a committee that oversees all of Her Majesty’s intelligence agencies and responds directly to the prime minister, as well as a member of the Cabinet Office Security Vetting Appeals Panel .

In short, it is clear that if Mifsud worked for the Russians, an incredible number of Western diplomatic, political and security personalities and institutions with which he came into contact could have been seriously compromised, a gigantic flaw in US security and government allies. And yet, as we shall see, this hypothesis has never raised alarm. The issue was raised last May , after the conclusion of the Mueller report, by the former president of the House Intelligence Commission, the Republican Nunes, in a letter addressed, among others, to the Secretary of State Pompey and the director of the FBI Wray, in which he asks for information on the Maltese professor:

“If Mifsud has extensive and suspicious contacts among Russian officials as illustrated in the special prosecutor’s report, then an incredibly large number of Western institutions and individuals may have been compromised by him, including our State Department. Alternatively, if Mifsud is not actually a counterintelligence threat, then it would raise doubts about his and his activities that made him the special prosecutor and questions about the veracity of his statements and statements. ”

“Is there a reason why Mueller just can’t, after 40 million dollars, tell us who Mifsud is and stops a step from calling him a Russian agent?”, Nunes asked in an interview already reported on the Atlantic in last July. “Somehow, this Mifsud, if he were really a Russian agent, as James Comey recently said, my God … you would have the compromised FBI, the compromised State Department, the compromised Congress. And the list goes on and on the damage that Mifsud would have done ”.

But no, another contradiction: Mifsud has never been treated as such a potential threat, neither by the FBI nor by other Western security services.

For almost all of 2017, even during the first months of the Mueller investigation, therefore, and even after being questioned by the FBI, the professor continued to maintain his contacts with academics, diplomats, politicians and Western intelligence figures, granted interviews and participated in conferences, without feeling in any way hunted or in danger. It is precisely by taking advantage of his participation in one of these conferences, in Washington, six months after the opening of the investigation, that the FBI decides to question him about his meetings with Papadopoulos. The occasion is an event called “Strategic Dialogue” in the heart of American power, Capitol Hill, held in February 2017 and hosted by Global Ties US , a non-profit organization supported by the State Department. In those days of February, the FBI questioned Mifsud, who in an interview with La Repubblica published on November 1, 2017, before losing track of it, recalled this: “Anyway, I’ve already talked to the FBI, when the Department of State invited me to a congress on Capitol Hill ”.

Therefore, the suspected Russian agent who plotted with the Trump Campaign to condition the elections is invited to speak at a conference on Capitol Hill, questioned by the FBI about his meetings with Papadopoulos and left to leave. Will they soon become aware of their naivety in Washington? No, because a few weeks later, on May 23, 2017, ten months after the opening of the counter-intelligence investigation into the Trump campaign based on those meetings, we find Mifsud at a conference on terrorism hosted by the Saudi government at the King Faisal Center of Riad, as reported by Chris Blackburn. In his own panel, expert Michael Hurley, who led CIA agents in Afghanistan in 2001 and was a consultant to the 9/11 Commission, and Katherine Bauer of the US Treasury Department. But the former US defense secretary Ashton Carter and Richard Barrett, former commander of the international counter-terrorism of the British MI6, also spoke at the conference.

We are almost a year since the opening of the investigation on Russiagate, the FBI questioned Papadopoulos in January and the professor in February, yet Mifsud still freely interacts with senior officials, big men of Western governments. On 19 October, a few days before losing track, he was even photographed with then British foreign minister Boris Johnson at a conservative party event.

In short, as soon as surveillance on the Trump Campaign started, and still in the midst of the Russiagate hysteria, the FBI and US authorities do not behave at all as if Mifsud were a Russian agent, a potential threat that could have compromised an incredible number of personalities Western policies and security. Yet, still in the spring of this year, in his report Mueller suggests that it is, however, taking care not to state it explicitly.

No one has ever looked for him after his death in November 2017. Not even an Italian prosecutor’s office has opened a dossier as far as it appears, considering that on him hangs a sentence in absentia of the Court of Accounts of Palermo for a sum of 49 thousand euros obtained as unjustified compensation from the University Consortium of the Province of Agrigento, of which Mifsud was president for some years. “Unknown residence”, the judges wrote.

The figure of Mifsud is therefore central in Spygate, because if he were a Western intelligence asset, then this would prove that Papadopoulos was lured and framed as early as the spring of 2016, long before the formal investigation Crossfire Hurricane , and would increase suspected that the Obama administration opened the Trump Campaign investigation based on fabricated evidence. And even if it were simply a boaster, the FBI would not make a great figure to have opened a counterintelligence investigation into the campaign of a presidential candidate, which would have fed Russiagate for years.

Some answers could be found in Rome, since it is at the Link Campus that Mifsud and Papadopoulos met for the first time, and it is still in Rome that the professor was seen for the last time before disappearing. As long as Copasir, the political and judicial authorities and the Italian press want to see clearly …

This is explosive stuff and this coming direct from Italy. Ask yourself why isn’t this all over mainstream media? 

Thank you, O for your submittal, keep the information flowing.